To manage a budget for construction successfully, you need to do more than add up the material costs and labor expenses. Contractors need to account for market changes, quotes from subcontractors, costs of equipment, revisions in the project, overheads, contingencies and unanticipated site conditions. If these factors aren’t carefully organized, even a profitable project can become a financial burden quickly.
A budget that is well managed gives contractors an accurate picture of the money spent and if a project remains on schedule. CostEstimator can help this process, by integrating quantities, unit costs, labor rates, and financial data into an organized estimating workflow. Project teams no longer have to rely on spreadsheets that are manually updated and disconnected. They can now maintain consistent information about costs from the preconstruction stage through to completion.
Benefits go beyond the individual estimate. Cost data organized by project can be used to compare estimates, assess profitability of projects, track budget fluctuations, make informed decisions on purchasing, resource allocation, etc. This data also helps managers forecast future projects.
A professional Construction Estimating Company is able to provide contractors with additional expertise in the areas of detailed quantity takeoffs and cost analysis. The objective is the same, regardless of whether the estimating process is done internally or by an outside company: to create clear, accurate financial data that will help contractors manage their projects confidently and protect margins.
Budget management starts before the contractor even submits his bid. It is important to understand the project scope, measure quantities, and organize costs into categories.
Budgets for construction should be divided into major costs components, rather than being treated as a total.
Examples of common categories are:
The structure helps to better identify the areas where budgets are being spent. Managers can look into the category if unexpected material costs increase without having to rebuild their entire financial plan.
Each estimate is based on assumptions. Materials prices can be taken from quotations of suppliers, while labor rates reflect the local market, or productivity rates are based on past projects.
Document these assumptions clearly.
If, for example, a contractor calculates concrete to be $180 per cubic foot based on the quote received from a supplier in January, then the basis should be recorded. The estimator will know the immediate impact if the supplier quotes $195 instead of asking why budgets have changed.
Estimates are easier to update and review when they’re based on clear assumptions.
Inputs that are accurate will help you manage your budget accurately. When multiplied by a project, even small errors can add up.
Imagine a project that requires 18000 square feet at $5.40 / square foot.
HTML0 = $97,200 x $18,000 = HTML0
Let’s say the estimator has added a waste allowance of 6%.
HTML0 = 19,080 sq. feet x 18,000 * 1.06
Material cost adjusted to:
HTML0 = $103,032 HTML0 = 19,080 * $5.40
Waste allowances increase the cost estimate by an additional $5,832.
The importance of a detailed analysis of quantity is demonstrated by this simple calculation. Budgets that do not consider realistic waste may underestimate actual materials required.
CostEstimator can help contractors differentiate between material and labor costs.
Take a package of masonry with an estimated total cost of $84,000. Materials account for $51,000 and the rest of $33,000 is labor costs.
When labor productivity falls and costs increase by 10%,
HTML0 = $3,300 x $30,000 x $0.10
This brings the total package price to $87.300.
Managers can pinpoint the exact location of cost changes by separating components.
Budgeting is just the start. The contractor must also compare the estimated cost with commitments and actual expenditures during the entire project.
The variance is the difference between expectations and reality.
Imagine that the initial electrical budget was $120,000 and current obligations are $127.500.
Variance:
$127,500 – $120,000 = $7,500
Variation in percentage:
6.25%
The project does not necessarily have problems if the increase is 6.25%. The management should look into the cause.
This increase can be due to design changes, material prices escalating, increased quantities, overtime or subcontractor price.
It is important to note that the difference is noticeable early on, allowing for investigation.
Budget control should be done throughout the construction process, not just at completion.
Compare weekly or monthly reviews
It gives managers a better picture of the financial performance, and allows them to take action before minor problems turn into major ones.
When contractors evaluate suppliers and subcontractors, budget management is especially important.
Three suppliers offer the same package of materials at different prices.
The initial price may appear to be the lowest, but it is not the only factor that should influence the final decision.
The contractor should consider the delivery schedule, payment terms and conditions, quality of product, warranty, accessibility, freight costs, supplier reliability, as well as availability.
The financial differences can be easily documented in a structured estimate record.
Bids from subcontractors can vary widely. The scope of a low-cost proposal could be incomplete, whereas a high-cost proposal might include more comprehensive coverage.
One subcontractor might bid $250,000. However, he may exclude the equipment rentals of $18,000. One subcontractor may offer $263,000 including the rental of equipment.
The first suggestion is adapted:
$250,000 + $18,000 = $268,000
This apparent price difference of $13,000 is no longer relevant.
It is important to compare the bids according to their scope rather than just choosing the lowest price.
Profitability should be supported by efficient budget management. The revenue alone is not enough to determine whether or not a contractor has been successful.
Imagine a contractor who secures a $2,000,000 project and anticipates total costs to be $1,720,000.
Profit expected:
$2,000,000 – $1,720,000 = $280,000
Profit margin expected:
Total costs would be $1,820,000 if unexpected expenses added $100,000.
New profit:
$2,000,000 – $1,820,000 = $180,000
New Margin:
=
The margin has been reduced from 14 to 9 percent due to an increase in costs that is relatively small.
Contractors should monitor the cost of a project and not wait until it is completed to determine profitability.
The contingency fund can protect you from reasonable uncertainties.
A 5% contingency for a project of $1.2million would be:
HTML0 = $1,200,000 * 0.05 = $60,000 HTML0
Reserves can be used to address risks that are legitimate, such as unforeseeable site conditions and reasonable adjustments in design.
Contingency, however, should not be used to cover up poor estimation. The estimating process should be examined if a project consistently consumes its contingency due to quantities being underestimated.
Each completed project provides valuable information that can be used to make future estimations. Contractors that preserve historical data on costs can improve their forecasting abilities.
Imagine that a contractor finishes three office renovations with the interior painting cost of:
Average is:
($4.10 + $4.35 + $4.25) / 3 = $4.23 per square foot
The benchmark for a project that will have 20,000 square foot of similar painting would be the following:
20,000 x 4.23 = $84 600
The estimate isn’t final because the current prices of labor and materials must be verified. The estimator can use historical data to get a good idea of the cost.
The historical analysis of estimates can reveal the areas where they are often wrong.
Management may want to investigate whether the site condition is being under-assessed during preconstruction if, for instance, completed projects are consistently exceeding budgets for site preparation.
In the same way, labor costs that are continually overcharged may be indicative of unrealistic assumptions about productivity.
Professional Construction Estimating Company will help contractors to analyze and create more accurate estimating benchmarks.
Visibility, organization and ongoing review are essential for effective contractor budget management. Construction budgets should not just be a number that is created and then forgotten. The budget should be updated as information about the project changes, and give management a clear picture of its financial performance.
CostEstimator can organize subcontractor bids, budget variances, contingent liabilities, materials, costs and labor. These components can help contractors identify issues earlier, make better decisions regarding procurement, project scheduling, staffing and profitability.
Confidence is the greatest advantage of structured cost control. Contractors are confident in their estimates, know why they made them, what the actual cost is, and how it affects the end result.
A stronger financial management system is created by combining organized digital estimation with professional judgement and historic project data. Contractors can apply this method to manage a commercial project or small renovation. They will be able to reduce risk, improve business performance, and protect their margins.
Budget management success is more than just spending less. Understanding every cost is key, as well as anticipating risk, utilizing resources efficiently, and taking financial decisions in advance to have an impact on the end result.
The process of managing contractor budgets involves planning, monitoring and controlling costs for a project from the preconstruction stage to completion. This involves tracking all expenses, including materials, subcontractors and equipment, as well as overheads, contingencies and other costs, against the project budget.
CostEstimator can organize financial data, such as project quantities, unit costs, labor expenses, materials, etc. These solutions can make it easy to compare estimated costs with actual ones, find out variances in pricing and update documentation.
The variance tracking displays whether the actual costs or commitments are lower or higher than budgeted. Early identification of differences allows contractors to take action and investigate the causes before an issue that was initially small becomes significant.
No. It is possible that the lowest bidder may not include important items such as equipment, material, transportation or any other cost. Contractors must compare bids on the basis of an equal scope and take into consideration price, quality and schedule as well as exclusions and payment terms.
Historic data can be used to benchmark quantities, labor productivity and costs of materials, as well as project performance. Contractors can use estimated results and the actual ones from finished projects to find recurring patterns, and make better assumptions about future work.